A group can customize it entirely to meet their needs, no coding required. Work OS is perfectly designed for large or small teams working together on notes, images, and documents, and everything in between. Two main differences between and Evernote lie in collaboration and workflow. This difference plays out in several ways. It is designed to adapt to the needs of the organizations who use it. In contrast, offers a wide range of templates for sharing tasks and collaborating on projects. While options for sharing and collaboration exist, they aren’t super intuitive and can be somewhat clunky. It’s useful for individuals who want to organize tasks, create to-do lists, or make academic notes.

It's still largely a work-in-progress and they're adding new features all the time (they're pushing frequent updates), but I think the desktop version will probably end up with a lot of capabilities that you see in the web version in the future.So, what are the key differences between and Evernote?Įvernote was (and still is) primarily a note-taking app. I'm in the beta, and as many have said, they're beta testing an electron app. I've actually got the best of both worlds right now. I'm not sure if that feature is available in the web version, but it wasn't last time I checked. I also like to export my data periodically so I'm not dependent on Evernote staying in business. When I do make a plain note, I'm fine with the basic formatting offered by Evernote.

I use it primarily as a document repository, and many of my notes are scanned PDF documents, attached images and other files, or web clips. I don't really suffer much from Evernote's lack of rich editing.

I like having multiple notes open, spread out across my screen (that's my biggest reason why, anyway).

Evernote web based